Plumbing the Depths of Unstructured Data
Turning to organizing measures like collaboration, ‘microdata’ and application of standards can help manage a deep source of information.
Can collaboration and sharing of data, within the context of adhering to a standard when devising data governance plans, help solve issues with handling unstructured data? This question arises when hearing how firms try to build data foundations to produce higher quality data analytics.
Data governance and analytics can be improved by building mechanisms to share data, says Leif Hanlen, a business development executive at Data61, a data requirements organization that is part of CSIRO, a digital development agency backed by the federal and state governments of Australia.
Yet, however advanced a data sharing system is, the rules that data vendors and exchanges have about their data make it challenging to join such disparate sets together, says John Denheen of Tyler Capital in London. “One of the big issues with getting good reference data is that you need to be able to tack it on to other data sets,” he says.
Before compatible standards can be achieved, firms have to identify the business practices that differ, says Sydney Hassal, a director at Scotiabank. Along with this, standards can vary among jurisdictions, observes Allie Harris of Bank of Montreal.
The US Office of Financial Research (OFR) points to “microdata,” which OFR chief data officer Cornelius Crowley defines as granular, targeted and specific information about entities, instruments, transactions or products. He advises that breaking down standards efforts to individual data elements like those he calls microdata can increase accuracy. In this context, one wonders whether unstructured data can be organized with a “microdata” approach—and what that can mean for following standards.
Harnessing unstructured data could be most useful to support consistent application of data standards.
Analytics Goldmine
Unstructured data is emerging as a “goldmine” for the application of data analytics, CSIRO’s Hanlen says, although it is nothing new—it is akin to “50 million Word documents saved over the last 10 years and put in a box.”
Firms should now understand the two types of unstructured data, says Hanlen. “Unstructured data sitting inside the enterprise—in the customer relationship-management system, in fields called ‘other’—is like a hole in the ground that’s yet to become a goldmine,” he says. External unstructured data from sources such as social media and market surveillance is already being tapped for its golden value, he says.
Analytics can come into play for the former type of unstructured data. “The task for analytics of unstructured data is not to build a brand new goldmine, but to extract elements of information from that unstructured data,” he says.
CSIRO and Data61 have worked on analyzing payments, documents predicting market outcomes and price signals based on the likelihood of future events. The challenge Hanlen finds in working with such unstructured data of a predictive—rather than measuring—nature is placing that data in a credible spectrum, which can be used to anticipate the future or a likely outcome.
Unstructured data may be a goldmine, but it is one that industry experts are just figuring out how to tap, for a variety of purposes. In March, ISITC executive Jeff Zoller pointed to unstructured data about investment behavior and patterns, as well as industry analysts’ commentary, and social and economic behavior, potentially supporting the disruption of data-management technology. In May, MUFG Canada Branch chief information and operations officer Ron Lee, speaking about how his firm is consolidating systems, noted this effort would increase the capability to work with unstructured databases.
Before any of these more aspirational purposes, however, harnessing unstructured data could be most useful to support the consistent application of data standards. The legal entity identifier (LEI) is ripe for this, as Karla McKenna, head of standards at the Global Legal Entity Identifier Foundation, observed in June, saying entity legal form information—a data element in the LEI repository—remains in “unstructured form.”
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Trading Tech
Expanded oversight for tech or a rollback? 2025 set to be big for regulators
From GenAI oversight to DORA and the CAT to off-channel communication, the last 12 months set the stage for larger regulatory conversations in 2025.
DORA flood pitches banks against vendors
Firms ask vendors for late addendums sometimes unrelated to resiliency, requiring renegotiation
IPC’s C-suite shuffle signals bigger changes for trader voice tech
Waters Wrap: After a series of personnel changes at the legacy provider, WatersTechnology examines what these moves might mean for the future of turrets and trader voice.
WatersTechnology latest edition
Check out our latest edition, plus more than 12 years of our best content.
From no chance to no brainer: Inside outsourced trading’s buy-side charm offensive
Previously regarded with hesitancy and suspicion by the buy side, four asset managers explain their reasons for embracing outsourced trading.
Band-aids vs build-outs: Best practices for exchange software migrations
Heetesh Rawal writes that legacy exchange systems are under pressure to scale to support new asset classes and greater volumes, leaving exchange operators with a stark choice: patch up outdated systems and hope for the best or embark on risky but rewarding replacement projects.
Portfolio trading vs RFQ: Understanding transaction costs in US investment-grade bonds
The MarketAxess research team explores how such factors as order size, liquidity profiles and associated costs determine whether a portfolio trade or an RFQ list trade is the optimal choice.
IEX, MEMX spar over new exchange’s now-approved infrastructure model
As more exchanges look to operate around-the-clock venues, the disagreement has put the practices of market tech infrastructure providers under a microscope.