Golden Copy: The €64,000 Question

ESMA fine of DTCC for neglecting reporting is curiously low

shashoua-2016-2
Michael Shashoua, editor, Inside Reference Data

The €64,000 fine levied by the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) on the Depository Trust and Clearing Corporation (DTCC) on March 31 is a curious action indeed for a regulatory body whose lack of preparedness recently led to a one-year delay in the effective date of the revised Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (MiFID II) regulation.

ESMA stated that the fine was issued because the DTCC was negligent in failing to set up systems and, in turn, provide derivatives data to the authority as required under the European Market Infrastructure Regulation (EMIR).

Last year, a Dutch regulator, speaking about ESMA and EMIR issues, said there were issues with the quality of data provided to repositories, but at the same time said the volume of the data was so great that it was difficult to sort through it all and make sense of it. European regulators, in this instance, as with MiFID II reporting, lack the systems, personnel and wherewithal to handle what their rules demand.

To qualify as noteworthy, regulatory fines against the financial industry usually are in the millions or even billions of dollars. So, in that context, a €64,000 fine is significant because it's so low. One could read into this that ESMA leaders are conflicted about really punishing the DTCC for faults that their own organization has on an even bigger scale.

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.

Removal of Chevron spells t-r-o-u-b-l-e for the C-A-T

Citadel Securities and the American Securities Association are suing the SEC to limit the Consolidated Audit Trail, and their case may be aided by the removal of a key piece of the agency’s legislative power earlier this year.

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a WatersTechnology account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here