Michael Shashoua: Identification, Linkage and Risk
The links, or lack thereof, between risk management and data management, have been the focus for some recent pieces of reporting and analysis in Waters’ sibling publication, Inside Reference Data. Each item on the growing list of regulations—Solvency II, Fatca, IFRS 13, Basel III and the legal entity identifier (LEI) standard—was designed with some kind of risk prevention or mitigation in mind. These rules have made financial industry data managers think about the need to improve data quality and data hierarchies, along with the construction of single, comprehensive views of data—single authoritative sources, to be more precise.
The identification piece certainly is a key to achieving this desired quality. One service provider, Alacra, which offers workflow tools, has produced a model that could be used with LEIs—a database called the Alacra Authority File. This database already includes agency-issue identifiers, International Securities Identification Numbers (ISINs), Stock Exchange Daily Official List (Sedol) identifiers, ticker symbols, Markit Red Codes, and other identifiers. But adding the LEI to the Authority File would be a capstone addressing regulatory status changes driven by corporate changes. Those are the events that create the very risks that drove the creation of the new rules to begin with.
Beyond the Obvious
Being able to track those changes would complement improvements in data quality, hierarchies, verification, validation, and linkage. The importance of good organization of reference data certainly is apparent at JPMorgan, which is realizing a data management improvement project as part of a merger of its securities services and investment bank operations into one group. The project, according to Ludwig D’Angelo, New York-based executive director of JPMorgan Corporate and Investment Bank (CIB), is expected to be complete by early 2014. It will yield benefits in higher data quality and easier data management operations.
JPMorgan recognized that having the right data hierarchies in place is a “fundamental building block for effective risk management,” says D’Angelo. In fact, effective risk management requires a single, comprehensive view of data, he adds.
In keeping with the significance of LEIs that Alacra identifies, D’Angelo also says that the LEI is a good starting point, even though more standardization is needed. Getting the LEI in sync with all the other identifiers already out there has to be part of achieving a firm-wide, consistent and reliable single view of all data.
There is a range of data management concerns that have to be compared and weighed up as part of a bigger reference data picture.
The Big Picture of Data
Standardization also stretches beyond just entities, into asset classification, according to D’Angelo. Any comprehensive risk analysis also has to include accurate asset classification, as well. When linking data, risk managers must know the pricing on listings, and whether those listings are used in options contracts, according to Marc Alvarez, senior director of reference data infrastructure at Interactive Data. That’s an example of making sure asset classifications are correct.
Getting those classifications correct in turn supports a better assessment of likely returns over time. So, aside from eliminating the risk of holding securities that are being affected by corporate changes that attract greater regulatory scrutiny and oversight, this more subtle form of data management is also indispensable to risk management.
Identifiers, asset classifications, data quality and consolidated views are all inextricably linked—to each other, to risk management, and to regulatory compliance. It’s not just the LEI that has numerous considerations still to be dealt with—there is a range of data management concerns that have to be compared and weighed up as part of a bigger reference data picture.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Regulation
CBOE and Aquis to make bid for European equities tape
The challenger exchanges have plans to become the second public bidder for provider of the European equities tape, following EuroCTP’s incorporation last year.
DORA stalls over identifier dispute
A disagreement over how to classify third-party tech providers on a reporting form known as the “register of information” has held up preparations for the highly anticipated operational resiliency rule in Europe.
UK, EU prepare for bond tape tender as Ediphy enters fray
Competition for the role of consolidated tape provider is heating up as regulators confirm tenders to open in Q1 next year.
Waters Rankings 2024 winner’s interview: S&P Global Market Intelligence
S&P Global Market Intelligence won two categories in this year’s Waters Rankings: Best enterprise data management (EDM) system provider and Best reporting system provider, which is the subject of this interview.
Preparing for the gathering storm
The Markets in Crypto-Assets (Mica) regulation came into force across the European Union on June 29 to enhance the transparency and integrity of the industry’s burgeoning crypto markets. Travis Schwab, CEO of Eventus, discusses his firm’s Mica strategy…
American Bankers Assoc. asks SEC: Do you know what you’re doing?
The industry group disagrees severely with regulators’ interpretation of the Financial Data Transparency Act, hinting at possible legal action in a recently published comment letter.
DORA will change the buy vs. build debate… maybe
Waters Wrap: With DORA’s deadline looming, trading firms are having to reassess their long-term tech strategies. Anthony wonders if that means more building and less buying.
The SEC needs a hand with artificial intelligence
The SEC wants to take a tough stance on AI, but it has a talent problem… or a marketing problem. Or both…