Tradeweb Bolsters China Bond Market Access with Electronic CIBM Direct Trading Overlay
Officials say the move makes Tradeweb the only platform to offer electronic trading in Chinese bonds via two different channels.
Fixed income trading platform Tradeweb has launched a new electronic mechanism for accessing Chinese bond markets, in a bid to further open the markets to participation by more foreign institutional investors.
China has made major inroads in opening up its bond market to foreign institutional investors over recent years, notably with the 2017 launch of Bond Connect, a joint venture between the China Foreign Exchange Trade System (CFETS) and Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing to promote overseas investment in domestic Chinese securities. The country has also included Chinese government bonds in indexes like the Bloomberg Barclays Global Aggregate Index and, more recently, JP Morgan’s Government Bond Index Emerging Markets suite, which have also fueled investor access and appetite.
Investors can currently access the onshore bond market via four channels: qualified foreign institutional investor (QFII), RMB qualified foreign institutional investor (RQFII), China Interbank Bond Market Direct (CIBM), and Bond Connect. But, as previously reported by WatersTechnology, more enhancements are still needed to attract more foreign institutional investors.
One such enhancement is a new electronic trading overlay that Tradeweb has added to its northbound access China Interbank Bond Market (CIBM Direct) channel, allowing foreign institutional investors to use the disclosed request-for-quote (RFQ) system. Previously, Bond Connect was the only way foreign investors could access China’s bond market through an electronic trading platform.
Currently, foreign institutional investors can access CIBM Direct and Bond Connect either through Tradeweb or Bloomberg.
Tradeweb CIBM Direct Link offers users functionality, such as Tradeweb’s automated execution tool, AiEX. It also provides investors with improved price discovery and allows them to submit and execute orders via disclosed RFQ, as well as have access to pre- and post-trade processing functions directly on CIBM.
Li Renn Tsai, managing director and head of Asia at Tradeweb, tells WatersTechnology that Tradeweb has seen more participation from investors.
“Our first-half 2020 versus first-half 2019 numbers in terms of average daily volume increased by 10.6%, from RMB 5.94 billion ($860 million) to RMB 6.57 billion ($950 million). So, in fact, we’re getting more participation from investors. The new participation has been partly due to index inclusions like Bloomberg Barclay Global Aggregate Index, which has been in place for a while, and then recently to JP Morgan’s Government Bond Index Emerging Markets suite. So, that’s certainly helped take activity up by quite a bit,” he says.
Tradeweb provides fully electronic access to the two most popular northbound entry channels into China—CIBM Direct, which was implemented in 2016, and Bond Connect, which was rolled out in 2017.
“CIBM Direct is a voice-traded access channel, but what we’ve done is launched an electronic trading layer on that channel. As a consequence, we’re the only trading platform that gives investors the choice of using two electronic access channels into China,” Tsai says.
The key difference between accessing through CIBM Direct and Bond Connect is the settlement infrastructure, he adds. Using Bond Connect, investors can essentially keep their funds offshore, whereas in CIBM Direct, they need to establish themselves with a local onshore custodian, which is the “more traditional” way to access these markets.
“It could be more complicated to set up, so there’s a balance, and investors have to make a decision based on what they think they want to do. If they go through CIBM Direct, it means that they become a domestic participant in the China interbank bond market, because they buy onshore,” he says. “In theory, this gives them access to all the instruments in the China interbank bond market, not just cash bonds, but also repo and interest rate swaps, and so on. As an institutional investor, you have to make that decision. There’s obviously a lot more involved if they want to access repo and interest rate swaps, so it’s not a straightforward decision, but fundamentally the difference is with Bond Connect you’re offshore and CIBM Direct you’re onshore.”
Tsai said that Tradeweb will continue to work with China Foreign Exchange Trading System (CFETS) to enhance both channels.
Further reading
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Trading Tech
Removal of Chevron spells t-r-o-u-b-l-e for the C-A-T
Citadel Securities and the American Securities Association are suing the SEC to limit the Consolidated Audit Trail, and their case may be aided by the removal of a key piece of the agency’s legislative power earlier this year.
After acquisitions, Exegy looks to consolidated offering for further gains
With Vela Trading Systems and Enyx now settled under one roof, the vendor’s strategy is to be a provider across the full trade lifecycle and flex its muscles in the world of FPGAs.
Enough with the ‘Bloomberg Killers’ already
Waters Wrap: Anthony interviews LSEG’s Dean Berry about the Workspace platform, and provides his own thoughts on how that platform and the Terminal have been portrayed over the last few months.
BofA deploys equities tech stack for e-FX
The bank is trying to get ahead of the pack with its new algo and e-FX offerings.
Pre- and post-trade TCA: Why does it matter?
How CP+ powers TCA to deliver real-time insights and improve trade performance in complex markets.
Driving effective transaction cost analysis
How institutional investors can optimize their execution strategies through TCA, and the key role accurate benchmarks play in driving more effective TCA.
As NYSE moves toward overnight trading, can one ATS keep its lead?
An innovative approach to market data has helped Blue Ocean ATS become a back-end success story. But now it must contend with industry giants angling to take a piece of its pie.
BlackRock, BNY see T+1 success in industry collaboration, old frameworks
Industry testing and lessons from the last settlement change from T+3 to T+2 were some of the components that made the May transition run smoothly.