Risk Management special report
Click here to download the PDF
Once Bitten...
One would hope that the maxim, "Once bitten, twice shy," could be used to appropriately describe the financial services industry in a post-financial-crisis dispensation, characterized by enlightenment, prudence, and dare I say it, even a modicum of humility. Only time will tell.
In many respects, risk management practices across the financial services industry were a ticking time bomb leading up to the financial crisis of 2008. While all market participants had at least some degree of risk management framework in place, what transpired in the wake of Bear Stearns' and Lehman Brothers' failures-the two highest profile bank collapses that contributed in no small way to the global credit crisis and the chain of financial and psychological events that ultimately dragged the world's economy to the very brink of complete meltdown-was, once the dust had settled, a return to the risk management drawing board where any and all financial services firms scrutinized their processes and procedures, and questioned their assumptions and models to ensure that if and when another similar event occurred, they would be better prepared to deal with the contagion.
Leading up to the financial crisis, all but the most sophisticated risk management practices were backward-looking and were invariably run on an overnight basis, given the complexity of the calculations and the computing resources needed to run measures such as Monte Carlo simulations and stress-tests. Needless to say, real-time risk management or even intra-day risk snapshots, generating enterprise-wide risk "maps," and managing counterparty credit risk on an ongoing basis during the course of the trading day, were, until recently, pipe dreams for all but the very largest sell-side firms with the deepest budgetary pockets. And, while those scenarios might still ring true for some of the industry's laggards, it's fair to say that the 2008 clarion has been well and truly heeded.
In the virtual roundtable section of this special report, which starts on page four, participants look at the extent to which buy-side and sell-side firms have embraced the move to managing their various exposures on a real-time basis; the technical, operational, and, in certain cases, the cultural challenges that need to be addressed before firms are in a position to monitor their risk on a real-time or intra-day basis; and the pivotal role that data plays in their risk management endeavors, along with the associated challenges around ensuring its cleanliness, reliability, uniformity, and the ease with which it can be shared across the enterprise. Only once these questions have been satisfied can the real-time risk management label be considered meaningful.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Trading Tech
Removal of Chevron spells t-r-o-u-b-l-e for the C-A-T
Citadel Securities and the American Securities Association are suing the SEC to limit the Consolidated Audit Trail, and their case may be aided by the removal of a key piece of the agency’s legislative power earlier this year.
After acquisitions, Exegy looks to consolidated offering for further gains
With Vela Trading Systems and Enyx now settled under one roof, the vendor’s strategy is to be a provider across the full trade lifecycle and flex its muscles in the world of FPGAs.
Enough with the ‘Bloomberg Killers’ already
Waters Wrap: Anthony interviews LSEG’s Dean Berry about the Workspace platform, and provides his own thoughts on how that platform and the Terminal have been portrayed over the last few months.
BofA deploys equities tech stack for e-FX
The bank is trying to get ahead of the pack with its new algo and e-FX offerings.
Pre- and post-trade TCA: Why does it matter?
How CP+ powers TCA to deliver real-time insights and improve trade performance in complex markets.
Driving effective transaction cost analysis
How institutional investors can optimize their execution strategies through TCA, and the key role accurate benchmarks play in driving more effective TCA.
As NYSE moves toward overnight trading, can one ATS keep its lead?
An innovative approach to market data has helped Blue Ocean ATS become a back-end success story. But now it must contend with industry giants angling to take a piece of its pie.
BlackRock, BNY see T+1 success in industry collaboration, old frameworks
Industry testing and lessons from the last settlement change from T+3 to T+2 were some of the components that made the May transition run smoothly.