Tweeting for Dollars: Can Twitter Help Land New Clients?
The other day I was reading a DealBook post about how some firms are trying to tap into Twitter to help investment advisors bring in new business.
It was an interesting read and dealt primarily with the compliance aspect of using Twitter, and even quoted Texas-based Socialware, a vendor that provides software for archiving messages and storing pre-approved tweets.
But what really jumped out at me came at the end pf the post: "Still, Morgan Stanley Smith Barney's Fay DeBellis, says she has not won any business from Twitter. She has had more success on LinkedIn, which she said brought her about $10 million worth of business over 18 months," the post read.
This year will represent the second straight year of firms on a wide scale experimenting with Twitter. Some are using it as a customer relationship management (CRM) tool. Some as a way to lure in new clients. Others are tapping into the site to collect information to make trades using sentiment analysis.
The latter use-case has the best chance of surviving if it can be proven to be effective. (My colleague James Rundle recently wrote an excellent piece on this topic for Waters magazine.) But on the asset management side of the business, it is still largely more of a compliance headache and has yet to show tangible benefits.
I believe that this year will be a make-or-break 12 months for Twitter, at least as the social networking site relates to the capital markets. For sentiment analysis there's a ton of potential. For everything else, I have my doubts that Twitter is worth the trouble.
Disagree? Send me a message on Twitter: @A_Malakian.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Trading Tech
Doubts raised over new FX platform disclosures
New disclosure sheet template will require platforms to outline how they charge for data
Expanded oversight for tech or a rollback? 2025 set to be big for regulators
From GenAI oversight to DORA and the CAT to off-channel communication, the last 12 months set the stage for larger regulatory conversations in 2025.
DORA flood pitches banks against vendors
Firms ask vendors for late addendums sometimes unrelated to resiliency, requiring renegotiation
IPC’s C-suite shuffle signals bigger changes for trader voice tech
Waters Wrap: After a series of personnel changes at the legacy provider, WatersTechnology examines what these moves might mean for the future of turrets and trader voice.
WatersTechnology latest edition
Check out our latest edition, plus more than 12 years of our best content.
From no chance to no brainer: Inside outsourced trading’s buy-side charm offensive
Previously regarded with hesitancy and suspicion by the buy side, four asset managers explain their reasons for embracing outsourced trading.
Band-aids vs build-outs: Best practices for exchange software migrations
Heetesh Rawal writes that legacy exchange systems are under pressure to scale to support new asset classes and greater volumes, leaving exchange operators with a stark choice: patch up outdated systems and hope for the best or embark on risky but rewarding replacement projects.
Portfolio trading vs RFQ: Understanding transaction costs in US investment-grade bonds
The MarketAxess research team explores how such factors as order size, liquidity profiles and associated costs determine whether a portfolio trade or an RFQ list trade is the optimal choice.