Opening Cross: Merging Speed and Smarts: The Next Big Thing?
The amount of data available to us today leaves us constantly making choices—what data to use, how to use it, how much weight to assign it, and what delivery method is appropriate for the business case in question: is it more important, for example, to perform deep but time-consuming analytics, or to receive the raw data as fast as possible?
Until now, low-latency data for algorithmic trading, and sophisticated analytics on niche datasets for functions that aren’t yet automated have remained largely separate, albeit with some crossover in areas such as complex event processing and tick data analysis, which perform analytics on low-latency data streams. However, I suspect this crossover will grow in 2012 as firms specializing in each area seek out a new edge.
There are plenty of examples to support each side of the equation, and a few that demonstrate this emerging middle ground.
As an example of the scale of investment in low latency, undersea cable provider Huawei Marine Networks last week announced it had signed a deal to construct part of a new trans-Atlantic cable for Hibernia Atlantic, which is investing in a new cable infrastructure to reduce latency between the US and Europe, dubbed Project Express, which won’t even be ready until the middle of next year. Meanwhile, NYSE Technologies, the data and trading technology arm of NYSE Euronext, opened a new “liquidity center” in Toronto, to provide high-performance access to data and trading platforms from NYSE’s markets and other exchanges via its SFTI network.
Another function of these datacenters is to support the massive processing requirements of vendors and firms managing the ever-increasing amounts of market data being generated and consumed by the industry, and to provide connectivity between market participants, such as CME Group’s new datacenter in Aurora, Ill., which is building a “community” of service providers; or datacenter provider Interxion, which last week announced it will host Nordic data vendor Infront’s systems in its London and Stockholm facilities, to provide improved speed and connectivity; or Savvis, which just announced a deal to host BATS Global Markets’ backup datacenter in its CH4 Chicago facility.
Meanwhile, outside the latency race, the scope of analytics is growing. Last week, data and trading technology vendor Fidessa unveiled Fidessa Intelligence, a suite of analysis tools integrated with its sell-side OMS, while Swedish visualization and analytics vendor Panopticon released connectors for other analytics platforms, including Thomson Reuters’ Velocity Analytics, OneMarketData’s OneTick, Oracle CEP, and Sybase’s Event Stream Processor, reflecting the need to perform analytics across multiple platforms and sources.
But analysis requires underlying data, and vendors are increasingly seeing value in creating niche datasets—such as Data Explorers’ news feed of securities lending and short sale data; EPFR Global expanding the capabilities of its fund flows data; or GMI’s expanded analytics based on environmental, social and governance (ESG) data. And those who don’t already own niche data are snapping it up: Canadian exchange TMX Group acquired the assets of shareholder data provider IR2020, while Deutsche Börse’s Market News International business bought the China Consumer Sentiment Survey from Hyperlink Market Consulting (Shanghai), bolstering its suite of economic indicators.
Meanwhile, in an example that bridges the gap between low latency and analysis, technical analysis software vendor Updata has integrated low-latency data from Activ Financial, and we can expect to see many more such deals in future as these two camps meet in the middle, to create the best of both worlds. As Simon Ringrose, managing director of sales at EPFR Global, says, “It’s about smart use of the data, rather than just providing the data itself.”
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Trading Tech
DORA flood pitches banks against vendors
Firms ask vendors for late addendums sometimes unrelated to resiliency, requiring renegotiation
IPC’s C-suite shuffle signals bigger changes for trader voice tech
Waters Wrap: After a series of personnel changes at the legacy provider, WatersTechnology examines what these moves might mean for the future of turrets and trader voice.
WatersTechnology latest edition
Check out our latest edition, plus more than 12 years of our best content.
From no chance to no brainer: Inside outsourced trading’s buy-side charm offensive
Previously regarded with hesitancy and suspicion by the buy side, four asset managers explain their reasons for embracing outsourced trading.
Band-aids vs build-outs: Best practices for exchange software migrations
Heetesh Rawal writes that legacy exchange systems are under pressure to scale to support new asset classes and greater volumes, leaving exchange operators with a stark choice: patch up outdated systems and hope for the best or embark on risky but rewarding replacement projects.
Portfolio trading vs RFQ: Understanding transaction costs in US investment-grade bonds
The MarketAxess research team explores how such factors as order size, liquidity profiles and associated costs determine whether a portfolio trade or an RFQ list trade is the optimal choice.
IEX, MEMX spar over new exchange’s now-approved infrastructure model
As more exchanges look to operate around-the-clock venues, the disagreement has put the practices of market tech infrastructure providers under a microscope.
The Waters Cooler: The Thanksgiving debrief
Maybe we shouldn’t use AI for EVERYTHING! I’m talking to YOU, Spotify!