Brownouts Over Blackouts: Market Circuit Breaker Alternatives

robdaly-headshot
Rob Daly, Sell-Side Technology

The Center for Innovative Financial Technology (CIFT), a part of the Livermore Berkeley National Laboratory, recently issued a whitepaper that offers alternatives to the market circuit breaker rules put forth by the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) after the May 6, 2010 Flash Crash.

The paper suggests implementing market indicators to identify imbalances in the trading environment and then slow down trading rather than cease it all together.

The two indicators mentioned are the Volume Synchronized Probability of Informed Trading (VPIN) and a version of the Herfindahl–Hirschman Index (HHI), both of which just consume trade and quote (TAQ) data.

The VPIN indicator, which is based on the earlier Probability of Informed Trading (PIN) model but replaces volume for PIN's time increment, measures the balance between buy and sell activities based on volume-time rather than PIN's clock-time measurement.

The Volume Herfindahl Index is one of the many flavors of HHI, which are widely used to measure the concentration of industrial production and other operations, according to the authors.

When the researchers fed both models historical data leading up to and including May 6, 2010, each showed a strong indication that a flash crash was approaching.

The paper's focus is more on how the researchers used a supercomputing environment and converted the historical data to version 5 of the Hierarchical Data Format (HDF5) from its original ASCII-based CSV format to reduce its overall footprint and make it easier to number-crunch. However, the endnotes are a treasure trove of sources.

Given how far the US markets have gone down the road with the industry-wide circuit breakers, it is doubtful that the regulators will look to scrap them in favor of another model. But if individual firms are looking to implement their own indicators to know when the circuit breaker might trip, this is definitely worth a read.

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.

If M&A picks up, who’s on the auction block?

Waters Wrap: With projections that mergers and acquisitions are geared to pick back up in 2025, Anthony reads the tea leaves of 25 of this year’s deals to predict which vendors might be most valuable.

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a WatersTechnology account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here