Hosting & Co-Location special report
Click here to download the PDF
Proceed with Caution
Turn the clock back two years and not very many people in our industry would have heard of the co-location and proximity-hosting phenomena. Even fewer would have had a thorough understanding of what exactly these services entail and why they were introduced to the financial services industry in the first place. It is fair to say that the astonishing growth in the hosting industry we have witnessed since early 2008 is here to stay-although, if this rate of change is anything to go by, the services on offer to market participants in two years' time will look very different to those available now.
As buy-side and sell-side firms' algorithmic and high-frequency trading (HFT) strategies continue to evolve, the one issue that needs to be addressed above all others is that of latency. Admittedly, latency is less of a concern for certain types of institutions-long-only asset managers with relatively distant investment horizons, for example, tend to focus more on the qualitative aspects of their business as opposed to the speed of executing their investment decisions, but for those shops that have come to rely on their HFT business as their bread and butter, speed is everything. And it is here where co-location-the practice of installing hardware within the premises of an exchange's datacenter-and proximity hosting-similar to co-location, although the hardware tends to be installed in a datacenter near a trading venue, as opposed
to within a venue's four walls-have so much to offer firms intent on shrinking their latency to the absolute minimum.
With this increased demand for hosted services, so too has there been a proliferation in the number of providers offering such services. This is a good thing for end-users in terms of choice, although the expansion is a double-edged sword: Variety is all well and good as long as you are able to exercise discipline when evaluating service providers in order to discern the types of services and providers that best meet your hosting criteria. Remember, the one-size-fits-all maxim very definitely does not apply to this space as financial services firms have different requirements. It's at times like this that you need to exercise caution and check under the hood ... and while you're at it, you may as well kick the tires, too.
Click here to download the PDF
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Trading Tech
Doubts raised over new FX platform disclosures
New disclosure sheet template will require platforms to outline how they charge for data
Expanded oversight for tech or a rollback? 2025 set to be big for regulators
From GenAI oversight to DORA and the CAT to off-channel communication, the last 12 months set the stage for larger regulatory conversations in 2025.
DORA flood pitches banks against vendors
Firms ask vendors for late addendums sometimes unrelated to resiliency, requiring renegotiation
IPC’s C-suite shuffle signals bigger changes for trader voice tech
Waters Wrap: After a series of personnel changes at the legacy provider, WatersTechnology examines what these moves might mean for the future of turrets and trader voice.
WatersTechnology latest edition
Check out our latest edition, plus more than 12 years of our best content.
From no chance to no brainer: Inside outsourced trading’s buy-side charm offensive
Previously regarded with hesitancy and suspicion by the buy side, four asset managers explain their reasons for embracing outsourced trading.
Band-aids vs build-outs: Best practices for exchange software migrations
Heetesh Rawal writes that legacy exchange systems are under pressure to scale to support new asset classes and greater volumes, leaving exchange operators with a stark choice: patch up outdated systems and hope for the best or embark on risky but rewarding replacement projects.
Portfolio trading vs RFQ: Understanding transaction costs in US investment-grade bonds
The MarketAxess research team explores how such factors as order size, liquidity profiles and associated costs determine whether a portfolio trade or an RFQ list trade is the optimal choice.