Cost and Complexity for Asian Tigers

As you may have been aware, I've been spending the past week in Singapore, while running our inaugural Asia-Pacific Trading Architecture Summit. Coverage of the event will be feeding through the website over the course of the week, but in advance, I thought I'd share a few observations and conversations that I had before, during and after the event.
Singapore, by the way, is a pretty amazing place. Part modern metropolis, part extended ethnic quarters, I found myself being seriously impressed by the way it could go from buildings that really gave a new definition to the word skyscraper, to small, pagoda-like houses and roof gardens in the time it took to cross a street. Being British, I have to comment on the weather and the haze, which was pretty good and relatively sparse, respectively. If you haven't been, please do, it's an experience. Just make sure you do it on an expense account.
Cost
Back to the conference. Cost, and the ways in which money can be saved in any place, were clearly on the top of everyone's minds, whether it was attendees or people that I met with. Given the amount of change going on, globally, and the need to adapt to new market conditions brought about by increasing electronic trade and interconnectivity, it's an expensive business, and the funds aren't necessarily there. One consultant that I spoke with said that people were just desperate to find ways to trim costs amid budget sheets that are the tightest they've ever been, which is more or less the same story everywhere, but perhaps more defined in Asia.
Why? Regulation is one reason, of course. When we discuss regulation in this column it's usually associated with Dodd-Frank or the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive review. It's big, muscular policy that affects multiple states or countries, and encompasses them all under its wings. Not so in Asia-Pacific, really, which lacks the total federal structure of the US, or the pseudo-federalized nature of the EU. Each country comprising Asia-Pac has its own set of rules, and they aren't necessarily compatible with one another. This idiosyncratic approach leads to a lot of investment that has to be made depending on whether you want to trade Singapore, Japan, Australia, Korea, Hong Kong, or any other region.
Siloes by Law
Take Singapore as an example. Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) rules dictate very strict guidelines on the movement of data outside of the country's borders, to the point where it's practically impossible to transmit outside of the state. This leads to relatively simple infrastructural elements - datacenters and the like, for instance - having to be regionalized in a specific state rather than created using a hub approach. Costly, as I'm sure you'll agree. Other rules about capital movement, such as those in China, strongly inhibit interstate trade in the region, and leads to banks having to find workarounds that end up being complex and expensive to implement.
Each country comprising Asia-Pac has its own set of rules, and they aren't necessarily compatible with one another. This idiosyncratic approach leads to a lot of investment that has to be made depending on where you want to trade.
A few weeks ago, I wrote about breaking down silos, but there's not a great deal you can do when you're forced into them by legislation. As such, the strongest advice from panellists was to grow according to need, because if you're setting up an office to handle thin trading in one market, it may not be worth the cost.
Thanks again to everyone who spoke, attended and organized the event. It was a lot of fun, and I'm looking forward to round two next year.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Regulation
No, no, no, and no: Overnight trading fails in SIP votes
The CTA and UTP operating committees voted yesterday on proposals from US exchanges to expand their trading hours and could not reach unanimous consensus.
Big xyt exploring bid to provide EU equities CT
So far, only one group, a consortium of the major European exchanges, has formally kept its hat in the ring to provide Europe’s consolidated tape for equities.
Jump Trading CIO: 24/7 trading ‘inevitable’
Execs from Jump, JP Morgan, Goldman Sachs, and the DTCC say round-the-clock trading—whether five or seven days a week—is the future, but tech and data hurdles still exist.
Pisces season: Platform providers feed UK plan for private stock market
Several companies in the US and the UK are considering participating in a UK program to build a private stock market composed of separate trading platforms.
How to navigate regional nuances that complicate T+1 in Europe
European and UK firms face unique challenges in moving to T+1 settlement, writes Broadridge’s Carl Bennett, and they will need to follow a series of steps to ensure successful adoption by 2027.
Nasdaq leads push to reform options regulatory fee
A proposed rule change would pare costs for traders, raise them for banks, and defund smaller venues.
The CAT declawed as Citadel’s case reaches end game
The SEC reduced the CAT’s capacity to collect information on investors, in a move that will have knock-on effects for its ongoing funding model case with Citadel.
Waters Wavelength Ep. 305: Cato Institute's Jennifer Schulp
Jennifer joins to discuss what regulatory priorities might look under Paul Atkin's SEC.