Rob Daly: OTC Algo Trading? Not Quite Yet
Ever since politicians and regulators moved to put trading of certain over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives contracts on electronic markets by way of swap execution facilities (SEFs), industry participants and observers have been asking: “When will we see algorithmic trading in these markets?” I understand this level of interest since any coverage of other electronically traded markets—equities for example—cannot go without the required editorial about the evils of high-frequency and algorithmic trading. However, the industry and the public are putting the cart before the horse here.
No Rules
First, the rules governing how SEFs operate do not yet exist and probably will not for the next 18 months or so. The US Commodity Futures and Trading Commission (CFTC) and the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) kicked the Dodd–Frank can down the road by moving many of the July 2011 deadlines to the end of this year. And given that 2012 is a presidential election year, no meaningful reforms will get through Congress, which is likely to continue to starve the regulators of funding and keep them from meaningfully implementing Dodd–Frank.
If the Democrats are able to recapture the White House and the House of Representatives, then Dodd–Frank will move forward much faster. Yet, if the Republicans maintain their majority in the House and/or win the presidency, they will let the regulation die or kill it outright. Either way, it looks as though it’s going to be 2013 before the dust settles on the political issue.
From a technology perspective, the entire trading infrastructure to support algorithmic trading in the OTC space still needs to be put in place. The first issue is not who has the fastest network pipe to the market, but who has all of the necessary historical data to back-test algorithmic trading strategies before they are unleashed on the market.
When setting up the new market structure, regulators will look to create a trade repository, which would allow the creation of historical trade databases. To do this, the industry needs to resolve the legal entity identifier (LEI) issue, which is needed to trade these instruments electronically. Some data experts expect this alone to take between 18 and 24 months to deliver.
When these markets do eventually launch, it will not be who has the best trading algorithm but who has the most intelligent smart order router. I have lost count of the number of organizations that have filed (or plan to file) for SEF status, and I think we are going to see more planned OTC liquidity pools than the 40 or so dark liquidity pools we have in the US today. With that level of liquidity fragmentation, dealers are going to have to route orders to multiple venues in order to get best execution.
Weaklings
The muscle these routers are going to need will make current smart order routers look like 98-pound weaklings. The amount of market data that they will need to consume and process will be closer to the equities options and fixed-income markets rather than simple FIX-based equities messages. After consuming all of the market data from the various SEFs, there is still the issue of each SEF’s individual market structure. Through most of the discussions around SEFs, market participants expect to see a request-for-quote (RFQ) model rather than order-driven markets. There are a few upstarts out there looking to create order-driven markets, but they are solidly in the minority. Yet, smart order routers will need to address how to route orders between the typically slower moving RFQ markets and their faster order-driven counterparts.
The eventual good news is that the SEF marketplace will consolidate relatively quickly compared to the US equities markets under Regulation NMS. The bad news is that it is going to be a rocky ride in this space for at least the next three to five years.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Regulation
Big questions linger as DORA compliance approaches
The major EU regulation will go live tomorrow. Outstanding clarifications and confusion around the definition of an ICT service, penetration testing, subcontracting, and more remain.
Insurance: The role of risktech in effectively managing emerging risks and driving competitive edge
This whitepaper covers the global survey, conducted by Chartis Research and TCS, of banking, financial services and insurance firms, which found that insurers are struggling to adapt to evolving risks and regulatory requirement increases. Chartis offers…
FX automation key to post-T+1 success, say custodians
Custody banks saw uptick in demand for automated FX execution to tackle T+1 challenges.
Observations and lessons to learn from the move to T+1
The next few years will see other jurisdictions around the world look to North America for guidance on transitioning to shorter settlement cycles.
Expanded oversight for tech or a rollback? 2025 set to be big for regulators
From GenAI oversight to DORA and the CAT to off-channel communication, the last 12 months set the stage for larger regulatory conversations in 2025.
DORA flood pitches banks against vendors
Firms ask vendors for late addendums sometimes unrelated to resiliency, requiring renegotiation
In 2025, keep reference data weird
The SEC, ESMA, CFTC and other acronyms provided the drama in reference data this year, including in crypto.
Waters Wavelength Ep. 299: ACA Group’s Carlo di Florio
Carlo di Florio joins the podcast to discuss regulations.