Exponential Growth in Benchmark Data

Benchmark and index data services are becoming much more competitive. This development is most evident in the reaction to Vanguard Group dropping MSCI as its provider due to high costs.
Research by consultancy Cutter Associates surveying its 200 member firms found that before this move by Vanguard, announced on October 2, firms would grumble about the costs of benchmark data, but would just suck it up and keep paying whatever was asked. Vanguard’s action could give the industry the backbone to demand more competitive pricing for benchmark data providers’ services.
In the providers’ defense, however, the complexity of benchmark and index data appears to have vastly increased over what it once was—and will continue to do so, as reported in an account of an exclusive WatersTechnology industry discussion. Data users are demanding rationalization of benchmark data, meaning checking what the benchmarks themselves are being based on and checking that benchmarks are operated within the correct risk limits. The proliferating numbers of securities that can be contained within a benchmark—as many as 13,000, as reported in our account—means processing benchmark data is also becoming more complex, as is correctly populating index data in users’ data management systems. To top this off, users want all this more sophisticated data daily or even intra-day.
In effect, firms—especially the buy side and fixed-income management firms that took part in the WatersTechnology discussion—have thrown down the gauntlet to data providers. Benchmark and index data providers will have to figure out how to provide much higher data quality, much faster, and for the same or lower costs.
The competitiveness of the benchmark data field just got exponentially greater. It will become harder for MSCI to rest on its laurels and simply call itself “the gold standard” if its users follow Vanguard’s lead and start defecting to competitors that provide data of equal or greater accuracy and quality, at lower cost.
With that in mind, it never hurts for the financial services industry to look to practices in other industries that could hold useful lessons. The ways social media data can be mined to answer questions in a range of fields could be applied to reference data management, as was related at the European Financial Information Summit earlier this fall. This month, we take a direct look at how the retail, telecommunications and energy industries perform data management and how their approaches can be models for data standardization and avoiding separate data silos.
The common theme in benchmark data’s growth and looking to other industries and fields for data management ideas is that the challenges of greater complexity and competition ought to spur more reference data innovations. I invite your thoughts on this at Michael.shashoua@incisivemedia.com or via our LinkedIn discussion group.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Data Management
US sovereign wealth fund project highlights the private assets problem
Firms have a growing appetite for private markets, as shown by President Trump’s proposed creation of a US SWF. GoldenSource’s James Corrigan writes that to ensure success, core technology must be built on strong data foundations.
DLT and digital contracts for market data: Has the hammer found the nail?
Waters Wrap: A new platform that a custom-made DLT underpins is coming to market. Anthony examines its merits and, surprisingly, finds a lot.
Bond CT hopeful Etrading unveils free tape prototype ahead of tenders
The vendor hopes to provide the long-awaited consolidated tape for bonds in the EU and the UK, demonstrating its ability to do so through ETS Connect.
Big xyt exploring bid to provide EU equities CT
So far, only one group, a consortium of the major European exchanges, has formally kept its hat in the ring to provide Europe’s consolidated tape for equities.
Orchestrade resists SaaS model in favor of customer flexibility
Firms like Orchestrade are minimizing funds and banks’ risks with different approaches to risk management.
Hyperscalers to take hits as AI demand overpowers datacenter capacity
The IMD Wrap: Max asks, who’s really raising your datacenter costs? And how can you reduce them?
New FPGA component aims to curb co-lo costs
Hardware ticker plant provider Exegy is working on a new FPGA solution that it says will free up costly processing power on firms’ existing co-lo servers.
Market data woes, new and improved partnerships, acquisitions, and more
The Waters Cooler: BNY and OpenAI hold hands, FactSet partners with Interop.io, and trading technology gets more complicated in this week’s news round-up.