Sibos: A Good Place To Check ISO 20022 Progress
Another Sibos in the Americas region is upon us, this time in Boston, seven years after it was last held there.
This mammoth securities and payments transaction operations conference, typically held in the largest convention center in its host city, with several streams of panel discussions and an exhibition hall three or four times as large as the Sifma Tech Expo in its best years, is a good place to take the pulse of progress—or lack thereof—on standards relevant to reference data, such as the legal entity identifier and ISO 20022.
Since the last Sibos in the Americas, in Toronto in 2011, there have been significant developments with those standards. At that time, the industry and its regulators were just beginning to define, understand and act upon upgrading ISO 15022 to ISO 20022, to figure out how business identifier codes and trader identifications relate to the LEI, and to contend with risk management rules such as European Market Infrastructure Regulation (EMIR).
It's a little disingenuous to say ISO 20022 only became an issue in 2011, actually. An interesting session planned for this Sibos is one on its first day, slated to cover "10 Years of ISO 20022." Although the ISO 20022 messaging standard, which is being applied to corporate actions operations in the reference data space, was starting to gain greater attention and support in 2011—as evidenced at that year's Sibos, as recently as 2013—there were doubts about its acceptance.
Two years after the Toronto Sibos, many users were still retaining ISO 15022, keeping the transition at a standstill or limiting its progress to the pace of slowly poured molasses.
Representatives of Swift (the messaging standards industry cooperative that organizes Sibos), Citi, Bank of America Merrill Lynch and other industry organizations and interested parties who are scheduled to discuss the decade-long history of ISO 20022, may or may not agree on whether ISO 20022 has produced better results as far as making processing corporate actions more efficient.
As a rule, with regulation and standards that Inside Reference Data covers, none of them are ever complete within a year, and more often than not, are multi-year efforts, first to complete their provisions with universal agreement from regulators and the industry, and then to implement compliance methods and systems. The only certainty for ISO 20022 is that now is a good time, with its ups and downs over the past few years, to make an assessment on its acceptance and effectiveness.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Regulation
BlackRock, BNY see T+1 success in industry collaboration, old frameworks
Industry testing and lessons from the last settlement change from T+3 to T+2 were some of the components that made the May transition run smoothly.
How ‘Bond gadgets’ make tackling data easier for regulators and traders
The IMD Wrap: Everyone loves the hype around AI, especially financial firms. And now, even regulators are getting in on the act. But first... “The name’s Bond; J-AI-mes Bond”
Can the EU and UK reach T+1 together?
Prompted by the North American migration, both jurisdictions are drawing up guidelines for reaching next-day settlement.
Waters Wavelength Ep. 293: Reference Data Drama
Tony and Reb discuss the Financial Data Transparency Act's proposed rules around identifiers and the industry reaction.
Clearing houses fear being classified as DORA third parties
As the 2025 deadline looms, CCP and exchange members are seeking risk information that’s usually deemed confidential.
Industry not sold on FIGI mandate for US reg reporting
Banks’ and asset managers’ tortured relationship with Cusip numbers remains tortured, as they tell regulators to keep the taxonomy in play.
T+1 shift sees out-of-hours human resourcing costs spike by as much as 20%
New research finds that trading firms are experiencing increased labor costs—which could be a boon for outsourced trading.
CBOE and Aquis to make bid for European equities tape
The challenger exchanges have plans to become the second public bidder for provider of the European equities tape, following EuroCTP’s incorporation last year.