IBOR I/O

An interesting wrinkle that emerged during Waters' recent breakfast discussion of the Investment Book of Record (IBOR) method of data management that appears to be taking hold in the industry, was whether firms should place responsibility for IBOR implementation in the front, middle or back office.
With IBOR's reference data nature, one would think it most likely would be a back-office responsibility. One might also guess that given the nature of front-office IT resources, or lack thereof, that IBOR might be a tall order for front offices. As Sylvain Pendaries, vice-president of front office and analytics at the Public Sector Pension Investment Board (PSP), a $76 billion Canadian fund, who recently remade IBOR at the fund, told attendees, PSP only has two developers on its front-office team. Most of the front-office is analysts, quants and portfolio managers.
As a result, for PSP and similarly structured front offices, they must either draw on IT resources elsewhere in their firm, or outsource. Pendaries believes that the prerequisite for deciding whether to buy or build for an IBOR is clarity about roles and responsibilities in the firm throughout the trade life cycle. "Once you know you have no liabilities, then you can look for outsourcing solutions," he said. "But don't do that unless you know the vulnerabilities in your organization."
A firm's front office may already be satisfied with the systems it has, as Eagle Investment Systems' Mal Cullen pointed out. An IBOR project can require implementation of multiple systems in succession, or leveraging of systems investments over time. As Bob Leaper of DST said, such projects stand a better chance of gaining traction if they are divided into shorter-term phases of three to six months each, with concrete results shown after each stage.
Another inherent challenge with an IBOR is the need for data warehousing to accommodate the large amounts of data necessary to maintain such a resource. The real-time nature of front-office needs means systems must be capable of delivering intra-day updates to and from the IBOR, keeping up with transactions that are happening.
Practically, IBOR is going to have to be operated and managed by the back office. That part of a firm is best suited to run IBOR because it has more time and expertise. That does not absolve front offices of responsibility, however. They must be sure they have a handle on IBOR output and work with their back-office colleagues to keep IBOR input and output flowing.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Data Management
Accelerated clearing and settlement, private markets, the future of LSEG’s AIM market, and more
The Waters Cooler: Fitch touts AWS AI for developer productivity, Nasdaq expands tech deal with South American exchanges, National Australia Bank enlists TransFicc, and more in this week’s news roundup.
‘Barcodes’ for market data and how they’ll revolutionize contract compliance
The IMD Wrap: Several recent initiatives could ease arduous data audit and reporting processes. But they need buy-in from all parties if all parties are to benefit.
‘The opaque juggernaut’: Private credit’s data deficiencies become clear
Investor demand to take advantage of the growing private credit markets is rising, despite limited data, trading mechanisms, and a lack of liquidity.
Fitch claims 20% developer productivity boost using AWS GenAI tools
The vendors have expanded an existing deal to include new Amazon tools that have helped Fitch modernize its infrastructure and applications.
US sovereign wealth fund project highlights the private assets problem
Firms have a growing appetite for private markets, as shown by President Trump’s proposed creation of a US SWF. GoldenSource’s James Corrigan writes that to ensure success, core technology must be built on strong data foundations.
DLT and digital contracts for market data: Has the hammer found the nail?
Waters Wrap: A new platform that a custom-made DLT underpins is coming to market. Anthony examines its merits and, surprisingly, finds a lot.
Bond CT hopeful Etrading unveils free tape prototype ahead of tenders
The vendor hopes to provide the long-awaited consolidated tape for bonds in the EU and the UK, demonstrating its ability to do so through ETS Connect.
Big xyt exploring bid to provide EU equities CT
So far, only one group, a consortium of the major European exchanges, has formally kept its hat in the ring to provide Europe’s consolidated tape for equities.